The Consolidation of the ESG Rating Industry as an Enactment of Institutional Retrogression
Emma Avetisyan and
Kai Hockerts
Business Strategy and the Environment, 2017, vol. 26, issue 3, 316-330
Abstract:
The socially responsible investing (SRI) movement has been aiming to create lasting institutional change by infusing the investment sector with new norms and values. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) rating agencies have emerged in response to the needs of SRI actors for reliable data on the social performance of firms. Since 2005, the ESG rating industry has witnessed a number of national and cross‐border consolidations. Based on a set of 37 interviews and secondary data, the paper explores the driving forces behind this consolidation as well as its impact. Our focus is on four ESG rating agencies, based in the United States, the United Kingdom, France and Switzerland. We conclude that in effect consolidation has at least partially resulted in institutional retrogression, whereby the traditional norms and values have reaffirmed their primacy, thereby somewhat negating the institutional change sought by the SRI movement. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (44)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1919
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:26:y:2017:i:3:p:316-330
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://onlinelibrary ... 1002/(ISSN)1099-0836
Access Statistics for this article
Business Strategy and the Environment is currently edited by Richard Welford
More articles in Business Strategy and the Environment from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().