Decontesting an essentially contested concept: The standardization of sustainable finance
Olivier Boiral,
Marie‐Christine Brotherton,
David Gilbert‐Parisée,
David Talbot and
Isabelle Martinez
Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025, vol. 34, issue 1, 39-56
Abstract:
The aim of this article is to investigate how the standardization process and the public consultations carried out in the development of new sustainable finance standards and laws tend to shape the decontestation of practices in this field. The analysis of 255 comment letters submitted by various stakeholders in the context of these public consultations shows the dual role of standardization as a mechanism for both the decontestation and the (re)contestation of sustainable finance. This article makes important contributions to the emerging literature on the governance of sustainable finance through initiatives that are meant to improve the transparency of disclosures in this field and prevent investor misconduct. In light of Gallie's theory of essentially contested concepts, this article also contributes to the literature on the challenges of developing sustainability standards and the implications of adopting practices centered on concepts whose meanings and applications are the subject of endless disputes.
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3972
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:34:y:2025:i:1:p:39-56
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://onlinelibrary ... 1002/(ISSN)1099-0836
Access Statistics for this article
Business Strategy and the Environment is currently edited by Richard Welford
More articles in Business Strategy and the Environment from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().