An Examination of Market Efficiency around Hurricanes

Reinhold P Lamb

The Financial Review, 1998, vol. 33, issue 1, 163-72

Abstract: Hurricane Andrew produced more than $21.5 billion in property damage in Florida and Louisiana. Hurricane Hugo caused about $7 billion in damage in North and South Carolina. Although both hurricanes were large, the magnitudes of their destruction and the geographic concentrations of their paths were markedly different. This study finds that Hugo and Andrew produced substantially different market reactions on property and casualty (P&C) firms. The industry was generally unaffected by Hugo, regardless of whether or not firms had exposure in the Carolinas. Andrew, on the other hand, generated a significant negative impact on firms with exposure in Florida or Louisiana. Other firms were not effected by Andrew. These observations indicate that the market demonstrated an ability to discriminate by the magnitude of hurricane and by P&C firms based on their degree of loss exposure. Copyright 1998 by MIT Press.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:finrev:v:33:y:1998:i:1:p:163-72

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0732-8516

Access Statistics for this article

The Financial Review is currently edited by Cynthia J. Campbell and Arnold R. Cowan

More articles in The Financial Review from Eastern Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().