Child labour measurement: Whom should we ask?

Sarah Janzen

International Labour Review, 2018, vol. 157, issue 2, 169-191

Abstract: Funding decisions to support vulnerable children are tied to child labour statistics, hence the importance of an accurate measurement. The author analyses whether the type of respondent plays an important role in explaining variations in child labour statistics. Using data from two sites in Tanzania, the analysis shows that “whom we ask” matters considerably when estimating the prevalence of child labour. The results suggest that prevalence increases by approximately 35 to 65 per cent when using child self‐reports rather than proxy reports. This bias affects 14 to 31 per cent of the sample, depending on the indicator. Discrepancies decrease as the child ages and increase if proxy attitudes demonstrate opposition to child labour.

Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12041

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:intlab:v:157:y:2018:i:2:p:169-191

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0020-7780

Access Statistics for this article

International Labour Review is currently edited by Mark Lansky

More articles in International Labour Review from International Labour Organization Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().