Measuring Distress Risk: The Effect of R&D Intensity

Laurel A. Franzen, Kimberly J. Rodgers and Timothy Simin ()

Journal of Finance, 2007, vol. 62, issue 6, 2931-2967

Abstract: Because of upward trends in research and development activity, accounting measures of financial distress have become less accurate. We document that (1) higher research and development spending increases the likelihood of misclassifying solvent firms, (2) adjusting for conservative accounting of research and development increases the number of correctly identified distressed firms, and (3) adjusted measures of distress alleviate previously documented anomalously low returns of large, high distress risk, low book‐to‐market firms. The results hold after updating stale parameters and under various tax assumptions. Our evidence raises concerns about interpretation of extant literature that relies on accounting measures of distress.

Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (33)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01297.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:62:y:2007:i:6:p:2931-2967

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.afajof.org/membership/join.asp

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Finance from American Finance Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().