 Unlocking the power of diversity for supply chain knowledge: Is pluralism in theorizing styles the key?Joep Cornelissen, Victoria Stephens and Lee Matthews Journal of Supply Chain Management, 2024, vol. 60, issue 3, 3-17 Abstract: The authors reflect on the opportunities for diversity in supply chain research by examining the prevalent modes of theorizing in the field. This examination focuses on identifying common styles of theorizing in supply chain management research, which are defined as specific modes of reasoning to make inferences about supply chain phenomena. Armed with this definition, the authors elaborate how research in the field has for the most part hinged on a propositional style as a common base for theorizing and theoretical contributions. The analysis that is provided emphasizes the limits of this style, particularly when it is considered as the preferred form for all theoretical contributions. The authors, in turn, make the case for a pluralistic system of knowledge production that supports the use of multiple theorizing styles that, when used alongside one another in a coordinated or co‐oriented manner, will lead to a better understanding of supply chain management phenomena. Date: 2024 Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:jscmgt:v:60:y:2024:i:3:p:3-17 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Journal of Supply Chain Management is currently edited by Lisa Ellram, Craig Carter and Chad Autry More articles in Journal of Supply Chain Management from Institute for Supply Management |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.