EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Myth of Meritocracy: Does Meritocracy Promote Economic Growth? Evidence From Turkey

Barış Alpaslan and Mevza Kurtulmuşlar

Review of Development Economics, 2025, vol. 29, issue 4, 2293-2310

Abstract: This paper makes a contribution to the literature in a number of important ways: First, this paper develops a two‐period OLG model to examine the interplay between meritocracy, social capital, and long‐term economic growth, highlighting how meritocracy can foster social capital. Second, this paper provides a novel measure of the meritocracy degree to determine the extent to which there is an incidence of nepotism in society; this is because meritocracy is the opposite of nepotism, that is, the lower the meritocracy degree, the higher the nepotism is or the other way around. Third, this is the first study that has provided a solid evidence base for Turkey in linking the notion of meritocracy with social capital and explaining its implications for long‐run growth. To this end, we calibrate our theoretical model based on a combination of theoretical restrictions and empirical observations. We conduct several policy experiments. We first consider an increase in the share of public spending on social capital building activities and infrastructure investment under two scenarios: each increase is financed by a cut in either other items or education. We also run a policy experiment associated with a decrease in the share of non‐meritocratic political elites. In general, the findings of our policy experiments show that a higher meritocracy degree can promote social capital and therefore long‐run growth. However, when an increase in the share of government spending on either social capital building activities or infrastructure investment is financed by a cut in education, in the benchmark case, the net impacts on long‐run growth turn out to be negative or very small due to the trade‐off effect, because it seems that the cut in the share of government spending on education is detrimental to growth.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.13218

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:2293-2310

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=1363-6669

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Development Economics is currently edited by E. Kwan Choi

More articles in Review of Development Economics from Wiley Blackwell
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().

 
Page updated 2025-10-22
Handle: RePEc:bla:rdevec:v:29:y:2025:i:4:p:2293-2310