Presidential Influence Versus Agency Characteristics in Explaining Policy Implementation

Steven A. Shull and David Garland

Review of Policy Research, 1995, vol. 14, issue 1‐2, 49-70

Abstract: We posit three rival models of policy implementation in the realm of civil rights: presidential influence, bureaucratic discretion, and prior activities. The first model, presidential influence, works better than the bureaucratic discretion or prior activities models. In fact, as modified in the analysis, presidential influence explains half of the adjusted variance in civil rights cases filed but just under a quarter of adjusted variance in cases closed. A combined model using the most powerful variables from each of the three models improved predictability only slightly and only for cases filed. The findings were encouraging, particularly when one considers the major problems that occur when analyzing data at the agency level.

Date: 1995
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1995.tb00621.x

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:revpol:v:14:y:1995:i:1-2:p:49-70

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.wiley.com/bw/subs.asp?ref=1541-132x

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Policy Research is currently edited by Christopher Gore

More articles in Review of Policy Research from Policy Studies Organization Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().