WELFARE TO WORK PROGRAMS: LESSONS ON RECENT STATE INITIATIVES
Judith M. Gueron
Review of Policy Research, 1987, vol. 6, issue 4, 733-743
Abstract:
Since the federally supported public assistance program became law in 1935, many developments have challenged our perceptions about the employability of welfare mothers and the appropriate design of the AFDC program. A consensus has been building that the AFDC program should be redesigned with the view that employable women and men have a responsibility to work and support their families. The result has been proposals stressing some form of work requirement. Several years ago, the Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (MDRC) began a five‐year social experiment examining current state efforts to restructure the relationship between welfare and work. The MDRC demonstration addresses four questions. First, is it feasible to impose work‐related obligations as a condition of reviewing welfare? Second, what do workfare‐type programs look like in practice and how do welfare recipients themselves judge the fairness of mandatory requirements? Third, do these initiatives make a difference? Fourth, how do program benefits compare to costs? Issues, findings, and conclusions are related to these questions.
Date: 1987
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.1987.tb00827.x
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:revpol:v:6:y:1987:i:4:p:733-743
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.wiley.com/bw/subs.asp?ref=1541-132x
Access Statistics for this article
Review of Policy Research is currently edited by Christopher Gore
More articles in Review of Policy Research from Policy Studies Organization Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().