Adam Smith’s Problems and Ours

Winch Donald

Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 1997, vol. 44, issue 4, 384-402

Abstract: The paper contrasts what modern economists, reflecting the priorities of general equilibrium theory, expect to find in the Wealth of Nationswith Smith’s own much broader theoretical and policy concerns. A theory of growth in which increasing returns are pervasive conflicts not only with neo‐classical expectations but with the emphasis on diminishing returns to be found in Smith’s classical successors. Smith’s assumptions on rationality, technology, firms, ‘projectors’, and the incompleteness of markets do not square with post‐Walrasian criteria. In advancing practical solutions Smith also shows more concern for the problems of living in a second‐best world than is common in pure theories of the invisible hand and the thinking of some of his free‐market admirers.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9485.00066

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bla:scotjp:v:44:y:1997:i:4:p:384-402

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0036-9292

Access Statistics for this article

Scottish Journal of Political Economy is currently edited by Tim Barmby, Andrew Hughes-Hallett and Campbell Leith

More articles in Scottish Journal of Political Economy from Scottish Economic Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley Content Delivery ().