A tax is a signal: theory and evidence

Francesca Barigozzi, Laura Cornelsen and Mario Mazzocchi

Working Papers from Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna

Abstract: We propose a theoretical model in which uninformed consumers update their beliefs about the health effects of sugar in soft drinks through two sequential policies: an information campaign and a sugar tax. The information campaign is modeled as a costless signal (cheap talk), while the tax policy is modeled as a costly signal. While the information campaign conveys only partial information, we show that the tax policy can generate a fully revealing equilibrium, thereby transmitting accurate information to consumers. Our empirical analysis supports the theoretical predictions. Exploiting the announcement (on March 16, 2016) of the tiered structure of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy, we provide evidence consistent with the tax policy functioning as an effective signaling device. Immediately after the tax announcement and before implementation, both the purchased volumes and the sugar content of taxed soft drinks declined, while purchases of exempted sugar-sweetened beverages remained unchanged. In contrast, the preceding information campaign had a similar effect across all soft drinks, regardless of their sugar content.

JEL-codes: D12 D82 H31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025-06
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://amsacta.unibo.it/8398/1/WP1206.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bol:bodewp:wp1206

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna ().