Will Limited Needs Kill Capitalism?

Gilles Saint-Paul

Capitalism and Society, 2006, vol. 1, issue 1, 36

Abstract: This paper argues that a number of ``unorthodox" analyses of capitalism can be understood from the point of view of orthodox economic theory. Our argument is based on the assumptions of monopolistic competition and that utility derived from consuming an individual good is bounded. The model's predictions are consistent with some popular heterodox views, such as ``In modern capitalist society, productivity is so high that many people are nearly saturated with goods;" ``Productivity growth reduces the real consumption wage of workers;" and ``The benefits from growth are appropriated by symbol manipulators." Furthermore, depending on relative levels of product diversity and physical productivity, globalization may harm poorer workers in LDCs, rather than unskilled workers in developed countries, as is usually predicted.

Keywords: growth; income distribution; bounded needs; monopolistic competition; inequality; wages; globalization; innovation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1932-0213.1000 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:capsoc:v:1:y:2006:i:1:n:4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/cas/html

DOI: 10.2202/1932-0213.1000

Access Statistics for this article

Capitalism and Society is currently edited by Edmund Phelps and Amar Bhidé

More articles in Capitalism and Society from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().