Prospective and retrospective causal inferences based on the potential outcome framework
Geng Zhi (),
Zhang Chao (),
Wang Xueli (),
Liu Chunchen () and
Wei Shaojie ()
Additional contact information
Geng Zhi: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, P. R. China
Zhang Chao: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, P. R. China
Wang Xueli: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, P. R. China
Liu Chunchen: LingYang, Alibaba Group, Hangzhou, P. R. China
Wei Shaojie: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, P. R. China
Journal of Causal Inference, 2024, vol. 12, issue 1, 15
Abstract:
In this article, we discuss both prospective and retrospective causal inferences, building on Neyman’s potential outcome framework. For prospective causal inference, we review criteria for confounders and surrogates to avoid the Yule–Simpson paradox and the surrogate paradox, respectively. For retrospective causal inference, we introduce the concepts of posterior causal effects given observed evidence to quantify the causes of effects. The posterior causal effects provide a unified framework for deducing both effects of causes in prospective causal inference and causes of effects in retrospective causal inference. We compare the medical diagnostic approaches based on Bayesian posterior probabilities and posterior causal effects for classification and attribution.
Keywords: causal inference; cause of effect; effect of cause; potential outcome; surrogate paradox; Yule–Simpson paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jci-2023-0063 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:causin:v:12:y:2024:i:1:p:15:n:1001
DOI: 10.1515/jci-2023-0063
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Causal Inference is currently edited by Elias Bareinboim, Jin Tian and Iván Díaz
More articles in Journal of Causal Inference from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().