The Strategic Importance of Public Recapitalisation in Banking Resolution, What Ireland Can Tell
Lefeuvre Elise ()
Additional contact information
Lefeuvre Elise: Dr. Elise Lefeuvre, Adjunct Lecturer, School of Law, University CollegeCork. Ireland
European Company and Financial Law Review, 2024, vol. 21, issue 1, 104-128
Abstract:
104 Recapitalisation of banks, as well as the whole banking resolution process, was fully public during the 2008 financial crisis. The Single Resolution Mechanism shifted from this approach and created a public-private system, where private individuals and entities can be called in to fund recapitalisation (bail-in). This article argues that recapitalisation (and banking resolution as a whole) should be fully public so it can be rapid, negotiation-free, and in the best interest of the State. The 2008 Irish recapitalisation illustrates well the rewards of having public recapitalisation, while it also tells where improvements are needed to protect recapitalisation process and taxpayers. Currently, the Single Resolution Mechanism has different recapitalisation methods, which creates some complexity and overlaps.
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2024-0004 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:21:y:2024:i:1:p:104-128:n:4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/ecfr/html
DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2024-0004
Access Statistics for this article
European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte
More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().