Proportionality of MREL for Transfer Strategies in the Context of the CMDI. Initial Considerations

Bevivino Vito
Additional contact information
Bevivino Vito: Assistant Professor of Law, Università degli Studi di Siena, DISAG – Dipartimento di studi aziendalistici e giuridici.Italy

European Company and Financial Law Review, 2025, vol. 22, issue 3, 379-388

Abstract: Even in light of the proposal to strengthen the common framework for bank crisis management and national deposit guarantee schemes (CMDI), MREL (minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities) in the context of bank crisis resolution continues to be a key tool. However, it seems clear that the rules determining MREL calibration may require revision if transfer strategies, which seem more suitable for resolving medium and small banks, are to play a greater role. The CMDI Proposal does not seem to fully develop such a revision. This raises concerns that we may miss a good opportunity to enable market-based resolution tools that are less burdensome for taxpayers.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2025-0018 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:eucflr:v:22:y:2025:i:3:p:379-388:n:1007

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyte ... ournal/key/ecfr/html

DOI: 10.1515/ecfr-2025-0018

Access Statistics for this article

European Company and Financial Law Review is currently edited by Heribert Hirte

More articles in European Company and Financial Law Review from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().