Rethinking Boudon’s Cognitive Rationality in the Light of Mises’ Apriorism and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics
Di Iorio Francesco () and
Di Nuoscio Enzo
Additional contact information
Di Iorio Francesco: GEMASS – Sorbonne Paris 4 University, 190, avenue de France, CS no 71345 75648, Paris cedex 13, France
Di Nuoscio Enzo: Università del Molise, Campobasso and Università Luiss, Roma, Italy
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 2014, vol. 20, issue 2, 129-142
Abstract:
The purpose of this article is to show that Boudon’s explanation of action in terms of “good reasons” can be philosophically enriched by merging his methodological perspective with Mises’ praxeology and Gadamer’s hermeneutics. In order to develop our goal of merging Boudon’s approach with Mises’ and Gadamer’s, we will focus on two points. The first is the identification of the invariable structure of human action. Unlike Boudon, we suggest that the best way to establish this invariable structure, which makes the explanation of action possible, is not to refer to the controversial concept of “human nature,” but rather to use Mises’ praxeological analysis of the invariable logic which all actions have in common. The second point analyzed in this article is the temporal and cultural dimension of the interpretative process which individuals elaborate to develop their reasons. This point, which is related to hermeneutical philosophy and is not investigated in detail by Boudon, is largely discussed by Gadamer. In our opinion, merging Gadamer’s description of the interpretative process – a process that Gadamer calls “hermeneutical circle” – and Boudon’s sociology of “good reasons” is useful because, unlike Boudon, Gadamer clarifies the epistemological nature of the interpretative process as well as the reasons why this process – which is a trial and error process – allows us to understand the actions of people who belong to different cultures.
Keywords: rationality; Boudon; Mises; Gadamer; methodological individualism; hermeneutics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1515/jeeh-2014-0010 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:jeehcn:v:20:y:2014:i:2:p:129-142:n:2
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jeeh/html
DOI: 10.1515/jeeh-2014-0010
Access Statistics for this article
Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines is currently edited by Pierre Garello
More articles in Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().