Building Mass Fatality Management at the Regional Level for Pandemic and Catastrophic Response
Stanley Sharon A. R.
Additional contact information
Stanley Sharon A. R.: American Red Cross
Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management, 2010, vol. 7, issue 1, 21
Abstract:
A traditional mass fatality management (MFM) approach will not build sufficient capacity for response and recovery based on the predicted death modeling for a 1918-like Pandemic Influenza outbreak or another catastrophic incident with a non-geographically centered impact (i.e. parallel waves of resource demand). Non-traditional mass fatality planning has lagged behind other disaster topics in terms of actionable planning that is realistically addressed and that engages the community. If national preparedness efforts do not acknowledge the need for a different type of non-scene based MFM approach, our country will remain unprepared. This article advocates for the use of a regional approach to MFM response and recovery.
Keywords: mass fatality management; public health surge; regional planning (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.2202/1547-7355.1682 (text/html)
For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bpj:johsem:v:7:y:2010:i:1:p:21:n:21
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.degruyter.com/journal/key/jhsem/html
DOI: 10.2202/1547-7355.1682
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management is currently edited by Irmak Renda-Tanali
More articles in Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management from De Gruyter
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peter Golla ().