Who should own the past?

Maija Halonen-Akatwijuka and Evagelos Pafilis

Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK

Abstract: We examine restitution of cultural goods and its optimal form, i.e. whether restitution should be definite or take the form of a loan. We show that loan can be optimal when the source country becomes indispensable due to its cultural significance, while full restitution is optimal when the host country completes restoration. Valuation changes can lead to restitution, but do not pin down its optimal form. Finally, restitution is not always optimal despite source country’s higher valuation for the cultural good. We apply our analysis to the restitution of Icelandic manuscripts and the proposed loan or restitution of Benin bronzes.

Date: 2025-04-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mic
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.bristol.ac.uk/efm/media/workingpapers/w ... pdffiles/dp25805.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:bri:uobdis:25/805

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Bristol Economics Discussion Papers from School of Economics, University of Bristol, UK
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Vicky Jackson ().