EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Particle drift potential of mesotrione and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron-methyl tank mixture in a low-speed wind tunnel

Milan Brankov, Guilherme Sousa Alves, Bruno Canella Vieira, Milos Zaric and Greg Robert Kruger
Additional contact information
Milan Brankov: Maize Research Institute "Zemun Polje", Belgrade, Serbia
Guilherme Sousa Alves: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska, USA
Bruno Canella Vieira: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska, USA
Milos Zaric: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska, USA
Greg Robert Kruger: University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska, USA

Plant Protection Science, 2023, vol. 59, issue 3, 284-291

Abstract: Particle drift happens during herbicide application when droplets travel outside the intended site. Different nozzles produce various range of droplets, so they play a very important role in coverage and drift occasions. When nozzles produce small droplets, the potential for off-target movement is very high. Another important factor determining particle drift is the distance between crops. Wind velocity gives the energy to herbicide particles to move away from the target place. Therefore, a drift simulation of herbicide (mesotrione and rimsulfuron plus thifensulfuron-methyl mixture) was done in a wind tunnel, using different nozzles Extended Range (XR) and Turbo TeeJet Induction (TTI). The wind speed was set at 4.4 m/s, representing the least favourable conditions where applications are possible. In the wind tunnel, eight crops (cantaloupe, cotton, green bean, pumpkin, soybean, sunflower, wheat, and watermelon) were positioned at 4, 6, 9, and 12 m downwind distances from the nozzle, and drift was simulated. Following treatments, plants were returned to a greenhouse for 28 days, and biomass reduction was recorded. Artificial collectors (Mylar cards) and water sensitive cards were positioned alongside plants. According to obtained results, spraying with XR nozzle influences higher injuries than TTI nozzle. Tracer deposition was higher at all distances when XR nozzle was used. Accordingly, droplet numbers, covered area, Volume Median Diameter (VMD), and deposition were higher on water sensitive cards when spraying were done using XR nozzle. As a consequence, higher biomass reduction occurred using the XR nozzle. The most sensitive crops were cantaloupe, pumpkin and sunflower, while the most tolerant were soybean and wheat.

Keywords: off-target movement of application; crop injuries; deposition (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/39/2023-PPS.html (text/html)
http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/39/2023-PPS.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:59:y:2023:i:3:id:39-2023-pps

DOI: 10.17221/39/2023-PPS

Access Statistics for this article

Plant Protection Science is currently edited by Ing. Eva Karská, (Executive Editor PPS)

More articles in Plant Protection Science from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:59:y:2023:i:3:id:39-2023-pps