EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Analysis of dry matter yield structure of forage grasses

N. Lemežiené, J. Kanapeckas, P. Tarakanovas and S. Nekrošas
Additional contact information
N. Lemežiené: Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture, Akademija, Lithuania
J. Kanapeckas: Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture, Akademija, Lithuania
P. Tarakanovas: Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture, Akademija, Lithuania
S. Nekrošas: Lithuanian Institute of Agriculture, Akademija, Lithuania

Plant, Soil and Environment, 2004, vol. 50, issue 6, 277-282

Abstract: An average dry matter yield structure (three cuts per growing season) in relation to agronomically valuable characteristics of six forage grass species and a year of herbage utilization was studied over the period of 1989-2002 in Lithuania. The most productive species of the first cut of two years of herbage utilization were Phleum pratense (P < 0.01) and Festulolium hybrids (P < 0.05) (average dry matter yield were 7.42 and 6.66 t/ha, respectively), moderately productive - Festuca pratensis, Dactylis glomerata and Lolium perenne (5.58, 5.42 and 5.20 t/ha), significantly lower (P < 0.01) yielding was Poa pratensis (4.19 t/ha). During two years of herbage utilization Dactylis glomerata produced significantly (P < 0.01) higher dry matter yield of aftermath - 7.30 t/ha. Other grass species were ranked in the following order: Festulolium hybrids 5.85 t/ha, Festuca pratensis 4.94 t/ha, Poa pratensis 4.57 t/ha, Lolium perenne 4.48 t/ha, and Phleum pratense 3.92 t/ha. Dactylis glomerata and Poa pratensis distinguished by the highest aftermath percent in the structure of the annual dry matter yield (57.7 and 52.2%). Phleum pratense formed an especially poor aftermath - only 34.6%. An average annual dry matter yield data analysis of two years of herbage utilization over the period of 1989-2002 showed that Dactylis glomerata and Festulolium hybrids were most productive (P < 0.01) species.

Keywords: forage grasses; dry matter yield; first cut; aftermath; regrowth (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4033-PSE.html (text/html)
http://pse.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4033-PSE.pdf (application/pdf)
free of charge

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:50:y:2004:i:6:id:4033-pse

DOI: 10.17221/4033-PSE

Access Statistics for this article

Plant, Soil and Environment is currently edited by Kateřina Součková

More articles in Plant, Soil and Environment from Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Ivo Andrle ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpse:v:50:y:2004:i:6:id:4033-pse