À propos de deux questions concernant le concept de patrimoine: de quels éléments se compose un patrimoine et quels en sont les titulaires possibles ?

Bernard Billaudot

Géographie, économie, société, 2004, vol. 6, issue 3, 291-301

Abstract: Varying contributions show evidence that it is not possible to understand what a patrimony is from the concepts of public goods and/or externalities as they are thought in the ordinary approach of economy when treating about non-marketable by contrast, that is to say from the market. Two questions remain notably without any precise answer : witch elements make a patrimony and who are the potential owners (titularies) ? It is possible to answer when starting from the concept of activity. Without deep analysis and excluding natural patrimony, we show that a social patrimony is made of free resources (resources-externalities and free products) and that the territory and the organisation are the two types of social structure owning a social patrimony.

Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=GES_063_0291 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-geographie-economie-societe-2004-3-page-291.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:geslav:ges_063_0291

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Géographie, économie, société from Lavoisier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().