Armement et dépenses publiques, quels enjeux pour l'analyse robinsonienne ?

Renaud Bellais

Innovations, 2001, vol. 14, issue 2, 139-158

Abstract: Public expenditures have a crucial place within the Keynesian theory. How then not questioning J. Robinson about the consequences of arms race? Especially since the Cambridge economist has been fiercely opposed to "military Keynesianism". It is interesting to replace military expenditures in her analysis, to show its interest as well as underline its limits. Politically dangerous and economically inefficient, these expenditures can play an great role to alleviate deficiencies of capitalism by allowing investments rejected or neglected by private investors despite their key role in a long-term perspective.

Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=INNO_014_0139 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations-2001-2-page-139.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:inndbu:inno_014_0139

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Innovations from De Boeck Université
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().