Quand le luxe devient une question économique: retour sur la querelle du luxe du 18e siècle

Arnaud Diemer

Innovations, 2013, vol. n°41, issue 2, 9-27

Abstract: Condemnation or glorification of luxury is a classic and recurrent question in the history of political ideas. Today, it continues to generate a set of conflicting emotions. In order to understand this debate, we chose to immerse ourselves in the history of economic thought, and, more specifically, in the quarrel of luxury that occurred during the Enlightenment. If luxury is immoral, it is not necessarily obnoxious, it participates in the circulation of wealth, maintains a certain industry and stimulates trade. The different positions of philosophers (Mandeville, Condillac, Montesquieu, Hume, Rousseau) and economists (Melon, Quesnay, Smith, Say) seem to reflect more a change in the systems of values (the interest and the useful versus the moral) than a real challenge of luxury consumption. JEL Codes: A11, A13, B11, B12, B30

Keywords: Hume; Mandeville; Melon; luxury; moral; utility (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A11 A13 B11 B12 B30 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=INNO_041_0009 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations-2013-2-page-9.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:inndbu:inno_041_0009

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Innovations from De Boeck Université
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().