La responsabilisation de la Société Générale. Normes juridiques et management dans le volet civil du procès Kerviel

Oussama Ouriemmi and Benoît Gérard

Revue française de gestion, 2017, vol. N° 269, issue 8, 65-81

Abstract: The present article looks back to the judicial conflict between Société Générale and its former trader Jérôme Kerviel. More precisely, it starts from the juridical mutation that occurred in 2014 in the civil component of the case, in order to shed light on the final judicial decision that ensued. On September 23rd 2016, the Versailles Court of Appeals ruled Société Générale accountable under civil law, while confirming Kerviel as the sole guilty party under criminal law. The conflict is thereby used as an opportunity to explore the juridical norms pertaining to managerial norms and practices.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RFG_269_0065 (application/pdf)
http://www.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-gestion-2017-8-page-65.htm (text/html)
free

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cai:rfglav:rfg_269_0065

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revue française de gestion from Lavoisier
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire ().