Decisiveness, Correctness and Accuracy in Criminal Adjudication

Francesco Parisi and Ram Singh
Additional contact information
Francesco Parisi: University of Minnesota
Ram Singh: Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics

No 350, Working papers from Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics

Abstract: While the right to a trial by an impartial jury remains a cornerstone of the Anglo-American legal tradition, the modus operandi of a “trial by jury” in the United States has been in constant flux. During the last 125 years, twenty-eight states in the U.S. reduced the size of their juries, while three others allowed non-unanimous verdicts in felony and/or misdemeanor cases. Blackstonian ratios and burdens of proof exhibited similar variations across jurisdiction. In 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court cast a critical eye on non-unanimous juries and reintroduced the requirement of unanimity for all felony convictions. In 2023, jury size also received scrutiny from the U.S. Supreme Court, underscoring the enduring volatility of criminal jury practices in the United States. Currently, states retain autonomy to determine the composition of their juries and to determine the Blackstonian ratios that their respective jurisdictions are to follow. In this paper, we expose the critical interdependence between these elements to assess how these variations in jury structure affect the accuracy and decisiveness of the jury process. We further show how the tradeoff between different combinations of jury size and burdens of proof is affected by the prosecutorial selectivity and the frequency with which hung-jury mistrials are brought up for a retrial. JEL Code: K0, K4

Keywords: jury size; standard of proof; Blackstonian ratios; mistrial; prosecutorial selectivity (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 36 pages
Date: 2024-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-inv and nep-law
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.cdedse.org/pdf/work350.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cde:cdewps:350

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
http://www.cdedse.org/

The price is free.

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working papers from Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics Delhi 110 007. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sanjeev Sharma ().