Valuing Intel: A Strange Tale of Analysts and Announcements

Bradford Cornell

University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management from Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA

Abstract: This paper examines the market reaction to a press release issued by Intel on Thursday, September 21, 2000. In response to that release, Intel’s stock price dropped 30 percent, erasing over $120 billion of shareholder wealth. By analyzing the press release in conjunction with analyst reports and by using a discounted cash flow valuation model, it is argued that the information conveyed by the announcement was not sufficient to explain the stock price drop. In an effort to explain this controversial conclusion, the paper documents the puzzling and procyclical role of analysts’ recommendations regarding Intel. Surprisingly, analysts were more strongly recommending purchase of the stock in August at $75 than they were recommending purchase in September at $40. This suggests a positive feedback between stock price movements and analyst recommendations that may increase the volatility of prices.

Date: 2000-11-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/4dm1h6qh.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:anderf:qt4dm1h6qh

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in University of California at Los Angeles, Anderson Graduate School of Management from Anderson Graduate School of Management, UCLA Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().