Competing Verdicts: Multiple Election Monitors and Post-Election Contention
Kelly Morrison,
Burcu Savun,
Daniela Donno and
Perisa Davutoglu
Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series from Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California
Abstract:
By influencing beliefs about electoral quality, international election observation missions (EOMs) play an important role in shaping post-election contention. As the number and variety of international organizations (IOs) involved in election monitoring has grown, many elections host multiple missions, and disagreement among them is common. This phenomenon of competing judgments is particularly prevalent in electoral authoritarian regimes, as leaders seek to invite “friendly” IOs to counteract possible criticism from more established EOMs. Drawing from research about the varying domestic credibility of EOMs and the demobilizing effects of disinformation, we argue that competing judgments increase uncertainty about electoral quality, which in turn dampens post-election contention. Using newly available data on EOM statements as reported in the international media, we show that competing judgments reduce post-election contention in a sample of 115 non-liberal democracies from 1990–2012. A survey experiment in Turkey solidifies the micro-foundations of our argument: Individuals exposed to competing judgments have more positive perceptions of election quality and less support for post-election mobilization, compared to those receiving information only about EOM criticism. Our findings provide systematic evidence that governments holding flawed elections have incentives to invite multiple election observation missions to hedge against the political risks of criticism.
Keywords: Social and Behavioral Sciences; Election monitoring; election observation missions (EOMs); international organizations; post-election contention; authoritarian governments (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-08-23
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ara and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/3kc4f57j.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:globco:qt3kc4f57j
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, Working Paper Series from Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().