EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

After Study for the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge (Phase I)

Francois PhD Dion, Michelle Harrington, Lisa Hammond, Joe Butler and Joshua PhD Seeherman

Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings from Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley

Abstract: This report presents an evaluation of impacts associated with the following changes that were made to the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge as part of a pilot project: (1) opening to traffic of the eastbound shoulder lane on the lower deck of the bridge between 2 PM and 7 PM every day (April 2018) and (2) conversion of the westbound shoulder lane on the upper deck of the bridge into a barrier-separated shared bike/pedestrian (November 2019). Specific elements evaluated include traffic compliance with the shoulder lane open/close periods, use of bridge paths by cyclists and pedestrians, impacts on eastbound and westbound traffic conditions, impacts on incidents, incident clearance times, maintenance activities, and quality of life in Marin County areas near the bridge. These elements are to be used by Caltrans to determine whether the changes should be kept, in whole or in part. Evaluations show that the opening of the eastbound shoulder to traffic has significantly reduced travel times and incidents in Marin County through the elimination of the congestion that used to affect the bridge’s I-580 East approach. In terms of usage, between 150 and 300 cyclists are seen using the upper path in each direction on weekend days, and between 50 and 75 cyclists on weekdays. Pedestrian traffic is usually very low, at less than 25 individuals per day. While the addition of the path on the upper deck has slightly decreased peak bridge capacity and increased travel time variability on the Richmond approach, congestion on the approach remains close to historical averages. Some slight impacts were also found on incident response and maintenance activities. A user survey finally shows a positive perception of the path by cyclists, but a more negative view from motorists.

Keywords: Engineering; Part-Time Shoulder Traffic Lane; Bicycle Path; Pedestrian Path; Traffic Impacts; Traffic Safety; User Survey. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022-06-30
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/1gd4t6gc.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt1gd4t6gc

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings from Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lisa Schiff ().

 
Page updated 2026-07-26
Handle: RePEc:cdl:itsrrp:qt1gd4t6gc