Should Courts Deduct Non-Legal Sanctions from Damages?

Robert Cooter and Ariel Porat

Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper Series from Berkeley Program in Law and Economics

Abstract: When legal and social norms regulate the same behavior, an act can trigger both legal and non-legal sanctions. Should courts deduct the non-legal sanction suffered by the wrongdoer from damages owed to the victim? We provide the answer for a legal system that seeks to minimize social costs. Non-legal sanctions typically harm the wrongdoer and benefit other people. In principle, courts should avoid over-deterring wrongdoers by deducting the benefit of the non-legal sanction from compensatory damages. In practice, instead of deducting the benefit of the non-legal sanction to other people, courts should deduct the burden on the wrongdoer. Deducting the burden of the non-legal sanction from compensatory damages typically improves the incentives of wrongdoers and victims. We make practical suggestions for courts to implement our proposal that would significantly reduce damages in torts and contracts.

Date: 2000-12-03
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/2bn166qw.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Should Courts Deduct Nonlegal Sanctions from Damages? (2001)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:oplwec:qt2bn166qw

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper Series from Berkeley Program in Law and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by eScholarship, California Digital Library ().