Proxy Issue Proposals: Impact of the 1992 Proxy SEC Proxy Reforms

Stephen J. Choi

Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper Series from Berkeley Program in Law and Economics

Abstract: This article assesses the impact of the 1992 SEC reforms that enhanced the ability of shareholders to communicate during a proxy contest. Utilizing a sample of 361 share-holder-sponsored corporate governance issue proposals from 1991 to 1995, the article finds that the mean percentage of total outstanding votes cast in favor of an issue proposal declined significantly post-reform. As explanation, the article furnishes evidence that certain sponsors interested in their own private agenda rather than general shareholder welfare exploited more fully the proxy mechanism post-reform; controlling for the com-position of sponsors, the proxy reforms generated no significant change in the for-vote outcome of issue proposals. The article concludes instead that the reforms resulted in a shift in the composition of issue proposals targets toward companies relatively less vul-nerable to such proposals pre-reform.

Date: 2000-01-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/6g6118kk.pdf;origin=repeccitec (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cdl:oplwec:qt6g6118kk

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Berkeley Program in Law and Economics, Working Paper Series from Berkeley Program in Law and Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by eScholarship, California Digital Library ().