 Land as a Factor for Economic Growth. Intertwined Trajectories of Large-scale Agriculture in Bulgaria in the 19th and 20th CenturiesNikolay Todorov () and
Petar Dobrev ()
Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research, 2023, vol. 8, 93-104 Abstract: Both Bulgarian and Western historiography have so far mostly ignored the capitalist estates in Bulgaria (the so-called ciftliks) in the 19th and 20th centuries. And while ciftliks were indeed relatively few in number, recent research shows their undeniable influence and persistence. Our work in the Bulgarian and Ottoman archives complements this trend, and in this article we examine some of the areas of successful large-scale landholding and hence the question of land as a factor in economic growth. By analysing the regions of Vidin, Burgas and Dobrudja, we try to answer the question of why ciftliks developed successfully only in certain areas of the country and, consequently, what determined their failure in other, otherwise fertile regions. In our work, we look for the interplay of historical, demographic, geographical and economic factors that make land a profitable economic investment in some places and make agrarian capitalism impossible elsewhere. Our reasoned assumption is that the Ottoman context is crucial for the development of ciftliks after 1878: the different forms of land use in the regions we examine in the late nineteenth century predetermined economic development after 1878 as well. For this purpose, we use Ottoman records of the temettuat defterleri type, which particularly fully show the state of agriculture in the 1840s, as the starting point of our study. We focus mainly on three zones - Vidin, Dobrudja and Burgas - the choice being dictated by the fact that in all three zones there were favourable conditions for large-scale agriculture, but only the two seaside districts developed such agriculture after the Bulgarian liberation, while in Vidin it was completely absent. This is determined by the fact that in the first two zones, during Ottoman times, the peasants owned the land, while in Vidin they were only tenants. It is interesting also to note that in Burgas there was a predominance of Muslim-owned ciftliks which after the Liberation of Bulgaria were bought or taken over by Christians, while in Dobrudja state protections helped the development of Christian-owned ciftliks even before 1878. With quantitative data we also show that in Dobrudja and Burgas ciftliks were economically viable and market-oriented agrarian structures, which in addition influenced the overall economic growth. Keywords: ciftliks; Ottoman Empire; Bulgaria; Burgas; Dobrudja; Vidin; Agrarian question; large-scale agriculture (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ceh:journl:y:2023:v:8:p:93-104 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Proceedings of the Centre for Economic History Research from Centre for Economic History Research Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.