A New Compact for Financing Health Services in Ethiopia

Solomon Memirie, Anastassia Demeshko, Mizan Habtemichael, Tesfaye Mesele, Amanuel Haileselassie, Pete Baker, Ole Norheim and Tom Drake
Additional contact information
Solomon Memirie: Addis Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, Addis Ababa University
Anastassia Demeshko: Center for Global Development
Mizan Habtemichael: Addis Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, Addis Ababa University
Tesfaye Mesele: Strategic Affairs Office, Federal Ministry of Health – Ethiopia
Amanuel Haileselassie: Strategic Affairs Office, Federal Ministry of Health – Ethiopia
Pete Baker: Center for Global Development
Ole Norheim: Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Setting, University of Bergen
Tom Drake: Center for Global Development

No 337, Policy Papers from Center for Global Development

Abstract: Recent years have seen health aid play a crucial role in improving health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, though challenges remain in optimizing the allocation and impact of these resources. We propose a framework for global health financing that advocates for aid to complement domestic resources by funding high-value interventions, enabling governments to focus on essential services. A case study in Ethiopia explored the implications of this “New Compact” approach, analyzing Ethiopia’s essential health services package and prioritizing interventions based on cost-effectiveness. By applying different financing scenarios, the study found that current health financing practices in Ethiopia are inefficient, failing to align resources with the most cost-effective interventions, thereby undermining goals for equitable health service delivery and Universal Health Coverage (UHC). The study suggests that adopting the full New Compact approach, where the Ethiopian government finances top priority health interventions while donor aid extends coverage to additional high-value services, could significantly enhance health outcomes, potentially increasing healthy life years (HLYs) by 15 percent. However, full implementation faces practical challenges, leading to the development of a partial New Compact scenario. This more realistic model retains most of the health gains by allowing some donors to adopt the new financing strategy while others maintain existing commitments, showing that even incremental shifts toward this approach can yield substantial benefits. The study emphasizes the importance of aligning donor aid with country priorities and demonstrates that even partial realignment can drive significant improvements in health service delivery and outcomes, ultimately leading to a more sustainable and resilient health financing system.

Pages: 57 pages
Date: 2024-09-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-afr and nep-ipr
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cgdev.org/publication/new-compact-fina ... l&utm_campaign=repec

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgd:ppaper:337

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Policy Papers from Center for Global Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ().