External Advisors and Privatization in Transition Economies
John Nellis
Additional contact information
John Nellis: Center for Global Development
No 3, Working Papers from Center for Global Development
Abstract:
This paper analyzes privatization and enterprise reform of three major countries in the transition region; Poland, Czechoslovakia (subsequently the Czech Republic), and the Soviet Union (subsequently Russia). For each, it discusses the prevailing ideologies of advisors prior to and during the transition process, the initial conditions faced by reformers and advisors, the policy frameworks that evolved, the results achieved, the mistakes made, and the opportunities missed. The ultimate conclusion is that while privatization could have and probably should have been done better, it nonetheless had to be done. The Czech Republic and Russia, and others in the region, are better off after the flawed privatizations they carried out than they would have been had they avoided or delayed divestiture. Poland, which did quite well at first in the absence of mass and rapid privatization, now finds itself burdened with a number of expensive and unproductive state firms. This paper shows how and why these outcomes came about, and what was the role of the external advisor community in the process.
Pages: 73 pages
Date: 2002-09-12
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.cgdev.org/publication/external-advisor ... mies-working-paper-3
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cgd:wpaper:3
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Center for Global Development Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Publications Manager ().