The Accuracy and Malleability of Parental Beliefs about Child Socio-Emotional Health

Audrey Bousselin, Isabelle Brocas, Giorgia Menta and Eugenio Proto
Additional contact information
Audrey Bousselin: Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER)
Isabelle Brocas: University of Southern California; CEPR; and IAST
Eugenio Proto: University of Glasgow; CEPR; CESifo; and IZA

CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE)

Abstract: We document systematic parental under-reporting of children's socio-emotional difficulties relative to children's self-reports, using representative data from Luxembourg, the United Kingdom, and Australia. To study the origins of this discrepancy, we develop a simple theoretical framework showing how parent-child gaps can arise from information frictions and differences in reporting styles. We complement the model with a novel survey design that elicits both parental beliefs about children's latent socio-emotional wellbeing and parental beliefs about children's self-reports, allowing us to disentangle the different sources of the discrepancy. Using a new survey from Luxembourg, we estimate that approximately 70% of the observed gap is attributable to information frictions. Consistent with a Bayesian model of signal extraction, belief accuracy declines when children experience high levels of distress. The precision of second-order beliefs is negatively correlated with parental education, income, and employment, and - paradoxically - with more accurate priors about aggregate parental under-reporting, a pattern we refer to as the Capacity Paradox. As predicted by the model, a randomized information intervention shifts both first- and second-order beliefs only among parents with weak priors and generates heterogeneous effects on intended parental investments. These findings highlight the central role of second-order beliefs in understanding parental misperceptions and the potential for targeted information policies to improve parental awareness of children's socio-emotional wellbeing.

Keywords: Parental beliefs; Child wellbeing; Information frictions; Second-order beliefs; Bayesian learning; Reporting bias; Information interventions JEL Classification: J13, J24, I10, I31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/research/c ... tions/wp795.2026.pdf

Related works:
Working Paper: The Accuracy and Malleability of Parental Beliefs About Child Socio-Emotional Health (2026)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cge:wacage:795

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CAGE Online Working Paper Series from Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Jane Snape ().