 What does equity in health mean?Joao Pereira No 061chedp, Working Papers from Centre for Health Economics, University of York Abstract: The question of what rules should be used in determining access to health and health care has been hardly addressed in the public debate on the future of the health service. In the UK, as in other countries, the goal of efficiency (production of output using least cost-methods) has dominated official pronouncements. Far from the public view, however, another controversy has raged on the “other objective” of economic policy: equity, which implies that economic and social goods should be distributed fairly across individuals. Curiously, this debate has been characterised by an immense production of empirical facts and parallel disregard for the precise specification of equity objectives. However, unless the objectives of the health system are clearly specified, empirical research can do little to reveal the reasons why equity is important, the extent to which specific types of inequality are compatible with equity, how the concept should be measured and how efficient policies to achieve equity goals may be formulated and monitored. To answer these questions it is necessary to specify a normative framework that may guide positive analysis in relation to policy-specific equity objectives. The paper reviews a wide range of literature by firstly identifying a number of criteria for evaluating the diverse concepts of equity which have appeared in the literature. This is followed by a critical appraisal of six well-established approaches: egality, entitlement, the decent minimum, utilitarianism, Rawlsian maximin and envy-free allocations. All of these distribution rules are found wanting in some respect when applied to the health sector. Given the shortcomings of traditional concepts, health economists have proposed alternative and novel formulations. The two most important contributions to date are Le Grand’s notion of ‘equity as choice’ and the health maximisation account, associated with economists at York University. Though these rules afford important insights into the question of what equity in the health domain entails, they too are problematic. In the final part of the paper, an approach which strangely has been virtually ignored by economists and others who share an interest in the health-equity problem is examined. Sen’s ‘capabilities’ concept, it is argued, comes closer to achieving all the specified assessment criteria than any other formulation previously discussed. As such it could prove an effective framework within which to organise research and policy formation in the area of health and healthcare inequality. All European governments are seeking to reform their health care systems. All too often this process gives little attention to the primary goals of health care policy. Unless these are carefully specified and reforms carefully related to them, it will be impossible to determine whether changes in policy, such as those envisaged in the NHS White Paper, can meet the designated objectives. Keywords: equity (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:chy:respap:61chedp Access Statistics for this paper More papers in Working Papers from Centre for Health Economics, University of York Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.