BAD FAITH MATTER UNDER UNIFORM DISPUTE REFORMATION POLICY & HUNGARIAN PROCEDURE LAW: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Fahed Wahdani,
Mohammad Alfaouri and
Osama Albguor
Additional contact information
Fahed Wahdani: University of Debrecen Faculty of Law and Political Science, Hungary
Mohammad Alfaouri: University of Debrecen Faculty of Law and Political Science, Hungary
Osama Albguor: Ministry of Interior, Jordan
Network Intelligence Studies, 2020, issue 16, 103-111
Abstract:
The conflict between main stakeholders, domain names owners & trademark holders, dominated cyberspace going beyond individual stakeholders into digital economy. As a turning point to resolve this conflict, UDRP existed as central device to solve this conflict with giving the parties freedom to go to court as alternative way to solve this conflict. In this regard, as the most of conflict cases were involved in bad faith matter, the national court has to be able to deal with bad faith matter according to the civil procedure law. In line with this, this study will try to find if the new Hungarian procedure law would be able to deal with domain names’ conflict based on bad faith matter.
Keywords: Bad faith matter; UDRP; Code of civil procedure; RDNH; WIPO (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/NIS_16_1.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmj:networ:y:2020:i:16:p:103-111
Access Statistics for this article
Network Intelligence Studies is currently edited by Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence
More articles in Network Intelligence Studies from Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Serghie Dan ().