Questioning the Moral Understanding of Law

Marijan Pavcnik ()
Additional contact information
Marijan Pavcnik: Faculty of Law, University of Ljubljana

DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 2017, issue 2, 111-116

Abstract: The primary content-related framework we are bound to are the basic human rights as established in the constitution. These basic rights may change and develop, yet as the heritage of our political and legal culture, they possess such a solid core meaning that only a "dogmatic sceptic" (G. Radbruch) can doubt it. In societies with plural values, the moral values expressed by the basic human rights are the most solid moral basis of law. The moral understanding of law is necessarily accompanied by a moral criticism of law. Such criticism is often not pleasing to the authorities, but it cannot be avoided if one wants to live up to our responsibility towards nature, society and future generations. A lawyer who is not interested in these issues and only sticks to the letter of the law acts in a fossilized manner and does not enrich the life that the law is intended for. Legal thought should always have its meaning, as Smole's Antigone would say.

Keywords: Moral Understanding of Law; Legal Positivism; Basic Human Rights; Moral Charge of Law; Acting lege artis; Moral Criticism of Law (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaco.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/pavcnik.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cmn:journl:y:2017:i:2:p:111-116

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in DANUBE: Law and Economics Review from European Association Comenius - EACO
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Helena Campbelle ().