Effective Capital Gains Tax Burdens Under Asymmetric Recognition of Real Losses

James Giesecke and Jason Nassios

Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers from Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre

Abstract: This paper compares three capital-gains tax designs for personally held assets: (i) the current nominal gains system; (ii) the new inflation indexation system with asymmetric treatment of real gains and losses; and (iii) a hypothetical system based on symmetric treatment of real gains and losses. We isolate the tax treatment of inflation-driven capital price changes by centring our analysis on the case where the expected capital-price path tracks the CPI. We make three findings. First, under the current system, which taxes nominal gains, the long-run CGT liability on an asset that merely preserves its purchasing power approaches 23.5 per cent of the asset's terminal value for a taxpayer on the top marginal tax rate. Second, the new system produces a loss recognition wedge, because real gains are fully recognised, while real losses are only recognised to the extent they are also nominal losses. At a 30-year horizon the resulting tax burden can exceed the tax burden of the current system. Third, the inflation rate contributes to the effective CGT burdens generated by both the current and the newly enacted systems, albeit via different channels: under the current system, inflation generates taxable nominal gains, while under the new system, inflation widens the band of unrecognised real losses. A symmetric real-gains tax avoids these distortions.

Keywords: Capital gains tax; Asymmetric loss recognition; Inflation indexation; Nominal versus real gains; Effective tax burden (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E62 G11 H21 H24 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-08
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.copsmodels.com/ftp/workpapr/g-373.pdf Initial version, 2026-08 (application/pdf)
https://www.copsmodels.com/elecpapr/g-373.htm Local abstract: may link to additional material. (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cop:wpaper:g-373

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers from Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mark Horridge () and Sam Marginson ().