On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study

Carmen Herrero (), Juan Moreno-Ternero and Giovanni Ponti ()

No 2006062, LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE)

Abstract: This paper reports an experimental study on three well-known solutions for problems of adjudicating con icting claims: the constrained equal-awards, the proportional, and the constrained equal-losses rules. We first let subjects play three games designed such that the unique equilibrium allocation coincides with the recommendation of one of these three rules. In addition, we let subjects play an additional game, that has the property that all (and only) strategy profiles in which players coordinate on the same rule constitute a strict Nash equilibrium. While in the first three games subjects' play easily converges to the unique equilibrium rule, in the last game the proportional rule overwhelmingly prevails as a coordination device, especially when we frame the game with an hypothetical bankruptcy situation. We also administered a questionnaire to a different group of students, asking them to act as impartial arbitrators to solve (among others) the same problems played in the lab. Also in this case, respondents were sensitive to the framing of the questions, but the proportional rule was selected by the vast majority of respondents.

Keywords: claims problems; proportional rule; experimental economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C91 D63 D74 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2006-06
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.uclouvain.be/core/publications/coredp/coredp2006.html (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study (2010)
Working Paper: On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study (2010)
Journal Article: On the adjudication of conflicting claims: an experimental study (2009)
Working Paper: On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study (2009)
Working Paper: On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study (2009)
Working Paper: On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cor:louvco:2006062

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE from Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE) Voie du Roman Pays 34, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Alain GILLIS ().