EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Democracy and Social and Solidarity Economy (SSE) - The example of mutual health insurance in France

Yannick Lucas (yannick.lucas@univ-lemans.fr)
Additional contact information
Yannick Lucas: Le Mans Université, Chaire ESS - Laboratoire ARGUMANS, (France)

No 2303, CIRIEC Working Papers from CIRIEC - Université de Liège

Abstract: Democratic governance is a constitutive element of a large part of social economy enterprises. In France, the first mutuals, in the modern sense of the term, appeared in the early 19th century. Bringing together free and equal citizens sharing a collective identity and wishing to break away from charitable practices based on unequal conditions, mutuals immediately adopted democratic principles. The statutes provide for the compulsory participation of members in the general assembly during which important decisions concerning the management of the mutual are taken. The specific features of democratic practice within mutuals will evolve over time. In the first legally recognised mutuals, the President was appointed by the public authorities to prevent mutual benefit societies from being used as a front for trade union and political activities in a context where trade unions and political parties were prohibited. Democratic practice was then limited to management decisions. With the development of political freedoms, this control was to diminish and eventually disappear, but another form of limitation of democracy was to appear with the supervision of the guarantees offered by the mutual societies. At the same time, the increase in the size of mutuals and in the number of their members limits the possibilities of direct participation of members in management decisions. Democratic practice is evolving towards a representative democracy in which democratic procedures are essentially used to appoint leaders. The democratic exercise is then situated at another level within the governance bodies. These developments, combined with an increase in the consumerist practices of members, mean that mutuals, like other organisations, are suffering from a "democratic crisis" which they are trying to resolve by recreating spaces for exchange and meeting with their members.

Keywords: Governance; Democracy; Mutuals; Social Economy; History (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I13 L31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm and nep-his
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.ciriec.uliege.be/repec/WP23-03.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crc:wpaper:2303

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in CIRIEC Working Papers from CIRIEC - Université de Liège Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CIRIEC (ciriec@uliege.be).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:crc:wpaper:2303