An Update on Locally-Administered Pension Plans

Alicia Munnell, Jean-Pierre Aubry, Josh Hurwitz and Laura Quinby

State and Local Pension Plans Briefs from Center for Retirement Research

Abstract: The financial crisis and ensuing recession have had an enormous impact on state-administered pension plans. Funded levels declined sharply, the Annual Required Contribution (ARC) increased to make up for the fall in funding, and the percent of A RC paid declined as the bottom fell out of state revenues. In response, states have increased employer and em­ployee contributions, cut employment, slowed wage growth, and lowered benefits for new employees (and in a few instances reduced COLAs for curr ent employees, but these initiatives have been challenged and are currently in the courts). Less is known about how locally-administered plans have fared in the last four years. This brief attempts to fill that gap. The discussion proceeds as follows. The first sec­tion describes our sample of 97 locally-administered plans from 40 states, which was collected initially in 2006 and updated to 2010 for this brief. The second section presents the change in the funded sta tus of local plans over the last four years, looking separately at plans for police/fire, teachers, and general em­ployees. It also reports the changes in the ARC and the percent of ARC paid during this period. And it compares the experience of locally- administered plans with those of state-administered plans. The third sec­tion reports on the impact of pension contributions to local budgets. This analysis is complicated by the fact that, in aggregate, only 40 percent of local pension contributions go to locally-administered plans, while 60 percent go to state plans. While good data are available for local-to-local contributions, local-to-state contributions are less explicit and in some cases must be estimated. Our calculations suggest that total l ocal pension contributions for our sample account for about 8 percent of local budgets. The final section concludes that despite the perils facing cities such as Atlanta, Chicago, Philadelphia, and Omaha, locally-administered plans, overall, are as well -funded as those administered by the states. But the demands of local plans are only half the story in terms of pressure on local budgets; local contributions to state plans will be a major driver of future budget burdens.

Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2011-07, Revised 2011-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/an-update-on-locally-administered-pension-plans/
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 403 Forbidden (http://crr.bc.edu/briefs/an-update-on-locally-administered-pension-plans/ [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://crr.bc.edu/briefs/an-update-on-locally-administered-pension-plans/)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:crr:slpbrf:ibslp18

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in State and Local Pension Plans Briefs from Center for Retirement Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Amy Grzybowski () and Christopher F Baum ().