The Paradox of Inequality
Oded Galor,
Luca Pensieroso and
Daniel C. Wainstock
Additional contact information
Luca Pensieroso: UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)
Daniel C. Wainstock: University of Oxford
No 2026018, LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)
Abstract:
How could inequality between social classes have ever persisted during the Malthusian epoch, as affluence led to greater reproductive success, diluting inherited wealth and narrowing disparities over time? This paper uncovers the Paradox of Inequality, establishes its robust theoretical foundations, and provides its resolution. The analysis suggests that elites’ lavish, nonproductive displays of status inadvertently diverted resources from reproduction, limiting the dilution of inherited wealth and sustaining inequality across generations. Ironically, extravagance preserved the wealth it seemed to squander.
Keywords: Inequality; Malthusian Epoch; Conspicuous consumption; Fertility; Paradox (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O10 Z10 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026-10-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-his and nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://sites.uclouvain.be/econ/DP/IRES/2026018.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Working Paper: The Paradox of Inequality (2026) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ctl:louvir:2026018
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES from Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Place Montesquieu 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium). Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Virginie LEBLANC ().