The Productivity Paradox: Evidence from Indirect Indicators of Service Sector Productivity Growth
Edward Wolff ()
Working Papers from C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University
Abstract:
Whereas difficulties in measuring the output of service sectors have been well documented, input measures are reasonably accurate. Using U.S. input-output data for the period 1958-87 and a number of indices of skill and occupational change derived from the Dictionary of Occupational Titles and decennial census data covering the period 1960-1990, I find strong evidenec that among all industries in the economy industry productivity growth is positively related to R&D intensity and knowledge spillovers from other industries but negatively related to major restructuring of technology.
Keywords: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; INPUT-OUTPUT; PRODUCTIVITY; SERVICE INDUSTRY (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O30 O32 O47 O51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 42 pages
Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.
Related works:
Journal Article: The productivity paradox: evidence from indirect indicators of service sector productivity growth (1999) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cvs:starer:97-39
Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
C.V. Starr Center, Department of Economics, New York University, 19 W. 4th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10012
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University C.V. Starr Center, Department of Economics, New York University, 19 W. 4th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10012. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Anne Stubing ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).