EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The evolution of the lexical richness of the Russian language (corpus research based on diachronic datasets from the national corpus of the Russian language)

Tatiana A. Rychkova
Additional contact information
Tatiana A. Rychkova: Murmansk Arctic University

Russian Social and Humanitarian Studies, 2026, vol. 18, issue 1, 156–181

Abstract: Background. The relevance of this study is determined by the need to investigate lexical change in Russian using modern methods. The scientific novelty of the work lies in the development and application of complex statistical models and indices for a systematic quantitative analysis of Russian lexis based on new, previously unexplored material — frequency dictionaries for the periods 1700–1916, 1918–1991, and 1992–2016, with a total size of 250 million tokens. This made it possible to identify and quantitatively describe the dynamics of lexical richness and the structure of the vocabulary in a diachronic perspective. Purpose. To determine the specific features of the dynamics of lexical richness in Russian on the basis of frequency dictionaries for the periods 1700–1916, 1918–1991, and 1992–2016. Materials and methods. The material of the study consists of diachronic datasets of the Russian National Corpus for the periods 1700–1916, 1918–1991, and 1992–2016. The methods include computer‑based corpus processing and testing for compliance with Zipf’s law, calculation of the Herfindahl–Hirschman Index (HHI), Simpson’s index, Berger–Parker index, Shannon entropy, the Type–Token Ratio (TTR) as a coefficient of lexical diversity, chi‑square tests of statistical significance, and other related measures. Results. Corpus‑based analysis of diachronic data for the periods 1700–1916, 1918–1991, and 1992–2016 revealed a decrease in the overall lexical diversity and richness of Russian from the pre‑revolutionary to the post‑Soviet period. However, this lexical impoverishment occurs mainly at the expense of rare and low‑frequency words, whereas the active vocabulary, by contrast, expands and becomes more productive.

Keywords: lexical dynamics; lexical evolution; Russian lexis; Russian National Corpus; diachronic datasets; pre‑revolutionary Russian; Soviet‑period Russian; post‑Soviet Russian (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2026
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/541/388 (text/html)
https://soc-journal.ru/jour/index.php/mssi/article/view/541 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cxm:russhs:18:1:2026:156-181

DOI: 10.12731/3033-5981-2026-18-1-541

Access Statistics for this article

Russian Social and Humanitarian Studies is currently edited by Fanuza H. Tarasova

More articles in Russian Social and Humanitarian Studies from Science and Innovation Center Publishing House 9 Maya Str., 5 office 192, Krasnoyarsk, 660127, Russian Federation.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Yan Maksimov ().

 
Page updated 2026-08-01
Handle: RePEc:cxm:russhs:18:1:2026:156-181