The risk of moral outsourcing: why artificial intelligence cannot and should not make our ethical decisions

Mohammed Zeinu Hassen

EthAIca: Journal of Ethics, AI and Critical Analysis, 2025, vol. 4, 428

Abstract: Introduction: The delegation of ethical decision-making to artificial intelligence (AI), a practice termed 'moral outsourcing,' was examined. Objective: This paper critically analyzes the philosophical and social implications of moral outsourcing to AI. Method: A philosophical and theoretical analysis was conducted, synthesizing arguments from ontology, ethics, and social theory. Results: The analysis revealed three core arguments against this practice. First, an ontological gap was identified; AI systems lacked the consciousness and subjective experience necessary for genuine moral agency. Second, the study found that the rich, contextual nature of human ethics could not be successfully reduced to formal logic without mechanizing historical biases and losing essential meaning. Third, it was argued that moral outsourcing would lead to an atrophy of human moral reasoning skills and an erosion of accountability. Conclusions: It was concluded that AI should be developed as a tool to augment, not replace, human judgment, and that the final authority for ethical choice must remain a fundamentally human responsibility.

Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dbk:ethaic:v:4:y:2025:i::p:428:id:428

DOI: 10.56294/ai2025428

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in EthAIca: Journal of Ethics, AI and Critical Analysis from AG Editor
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Javier Gonzalez-Argote ().