Biases in accounting publications: myths and truths

Rafael Romero-Carazas

Seminars in Medical Writing and Education, 2024, vol. 3, 623

Abstract: This study was carried out with the aim of analysing the biases of accounting publications: myths and truths. In its development, the analytical method was used from a descriptive perspective, as well as the research tools of the documentary review. The findings indicate that the observation, reflection, analysis and prediction skills of accountants remain underdeveloped throughout the training period, with the result that quantitative rather than qualitative data are considered more in decision-making. Reasons for this include a lack of clarity about its usefulness and its role in developing innovative approaches to accounting theory and practice. It is concluded that accounting is projective and predictive, so studying, understanding and introducing it as a basis for financial analysis in accounting practice requires a unique pedagogy; due to changes in the perception of reality, new types of observation are conducive to solving its difficult challenges.

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dbk:medicw:v:3:y:2024:i::p:623:id:623

DOI: 10.56294/mw2024623

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Seminars in Medical Writing and Education from AG Editor (Argentina)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Javier Gonzalez-Argote ().