Analysis of the difference of the legally relevant facts of the indicator facts

Lina Verónica Botero Gómez and Diego Alejandro Nova Guevara

Multidisciplinar (Montevideo), 2024, vol. 1, 17

Abstract: Current jurisprudential positions have exposed a series of errors incurred within the new accusatory criminal system led by the Attorney General's Office, specifically in the construction of the Legally Relevant Facts, since it does not conform to the expected and indicated assumptions. by law and other rules of criminal procedure. These failures are directly related to effects on due process, in such a way that it is the responsibility of all levels of society and especially the judicial branch to deal with mistakes. That is why, through a general analysis of all the aspects that frame the criminal technique of the Legally Relevant Facts found in the Political Constitution of Colombia, in the jurisprudence and other laws, it was possible to identify such failures, their consequences, but also formulated a series of recommendations that are expected to serve to reduce the risk of the duration of rights and become a point of reference for similar investigations

Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dbk:multid:v:1:y:2024:i::p:17:id:1062486agmu202317

DOI: 10.62486/agmu202317

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Multidisciplinar (Montevideo) from AG Editor
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Javier Gonzalez-Argote ().