Does Increasing Public Spending in Health Improve Health? Lessons from a Constitutional Reform in Brazil

Damian Clarke, Rudi Rocha and Michel Szklo

No 2300, Research Department working papers from CAF Development Bank Of Latinamerica

Abstract: There is surprisingly scarce evidence regarding the extent to which and how government health expenditure affects health outcomes. Exploiting variation generated by Brazil’s 29th Constitutional Amendment, which mandated minimum thresholds for municipal spending on health, we examine the chain connecting government health spending to health inputs, production and outcomes, with a focus on infant mortality. We find relatively low average elasticities, but relevant heterogeneity in spending returns. Reductions in infant mortality are greater where baseline spending was lower, pointing to concave returns; where investments in infrastructure and personnel were complementary; and particularly where strong institutional and public management capabilities exist.

Keywords: Gobernabilidad; Salud (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/2300

Related works:
Working Paper: Does Increasing Public Spending in Health Improve Health? Lessons from a Constitutional Reform in Brazil (2024)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dbl:dblwop:2300

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Research Department working papers from CAF Development Bank Of Latinamerica Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Pablo Rolando ().