Protected Areas: Desperately Seeking Sustainable Development. A novel analytical framework for a multidimensional bottom-up approach

Mireille Razafindrakoto (), François Roubaud (), Florent Bédécarrats, Stéphanie Carrière and Emmanuel Pannier
Additional contact information
Mireille Razafindrakoto: LEDa-DIAL, IRD, CNRS, Universite Paris-Dauphine, Universite PSL, Paris
François Roubaud: LEDa-DIAL, IRD, CNRS, Universite Paris-Dauphine, Universite PSL, Paris
Florent Bédécarrats: IRD, SOURCE - SOUtenabilité et RésilienCE,
Stéphanie Carrière: IRD, SENS - Savoirs, ENvironnement et Sociétés
Emmanuel Pannier: IRD, PALOC - Patrimoines locaux, Environnement et Globalisation

No DT/2026/05, Working Papers from DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation)

Abstract: Despite repeated calls for urgent action to address biodiversity loss, the resounding verdict is that most conservation policies, in particular their main policy measure, Protected Areas (PAs), have failed to halt environmental degradation and achieve meaningful social outcomes. Yet, the international community has committed to extending PA coverage to 30% of the planet by 2030, and with one-third of the Global South’s population already living in or near a PA, this proportion is set to become a majority. In view of this, the current practice, which is supposed to promote sustainable development but is problematic, consists of juxtaposing socioeconomic policies and environmental policies, often regarded as mutually antagonistic, without considering a comprehensive view of governance issues. This article reviews the impact of PAs on biodiversity and the populations’ living conditions and identifies the knowledge gaps, before looking into why biodiversity conservation has been prioritised, inconclusively, to the detriment of local sociopolitical and economic dynamics and why the narrow principle of ‘inclusive governance’, more words than deeds, falls far short of the mark. The traditional approach, which is blind to the fact that conservation and development objectives are embedded within power relations and a broader sociopolitical dynamic, dominated by extractivist and capitalist logic, should be challenged. We propose a novel analytical framework with an operational methodological approach grounded in critical political ecology in order to take a bottom-up approach rooted in a territory and improve our understanding of the complex interactions between local socioecological, socioeconomic and sociopolitical concerns. This approach will help put in place more effective and inclusive policies consistent with local livelihoods, ways of life, equity and justice.

Keywords: Protected areas; Methodological Framework; Monitoring; Interdisciplinarity; Conservation-development system (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C81 O44 Q01 Q56 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 19 pages
Date: 2026-07
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://dial.ird.fr/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/202 ... ravail-Dial-2026.pdf First version, 2026 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:dia:wpaper:dt202605

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from DIAL (Développement, Institutions et Mondialisation) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Loic Le Pezennec ().