Interest Groups and Patent Reform in India

Anitha Ramanna
Additional contact information
Anitha Ramanna: Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research

Development Economics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research

Abstract: Indias patent reforms represent a shift in Indias policy from one of enormous opposition to revising patent laws according to the WTO, to one of compliance with many aspects of TRIPs (Trade Related Intellectual Property Rights) Agreement. Industry and civil society had a strong interest in blocking reforms on IPRs (Intellectual Property Rights), and initially played an important role in preventing reforms of Indias patent law. India has recently changed its patent regime, led by important industry groups who revised their positions, and new NGOs that promoted reform. The preferences of actors and their changing interests are important factors in the reform process. Perceived benefits from the new regime partly explain the rise of a pro-reform constituency among industry and NGOs. Yet preference formation is complex and depends on interpretation of strategies by various actors. The Indian pharmaceutical case reflects the imperatives both to forge ahead on patent reform, while protecting the generic market and restricting IPRs. NGOs that emerged to support patent reform also played a role in directing policy towards protecting traditional knowledge. The interests of actors do not always follow predictable paths, and are not fixed. Evaluating the preferences of actors rather than assuming them provides insights into the way policy processes are shaped.

Keywords: intellectual property rights; industry groups; NGOs; reform; preferences. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O34 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003-01
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.eaber.org/node/22346 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 301 [REDIRECT LOOP] Moved Permanently (http://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346 [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.eaber.org/node/22346)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:eab:develo:22346

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Development Economics Working Papers from East Asian Bureau of Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Shiro Armstrong ().